The Real Uber Threat Isn’t Distribution. It’s Loyalty.

Uber’s April 2026 moves – an Expedia-powered hotel marketplace inside the app and a multi-market ALL Accor loyalty tie-up – are real but more incremental than transformational; they reshape demand capture, not demand creation, because the deciding moment for a hotel stay rarely happens inside a rideshare app.

The structural threat to hotels is not Uber as a booking channel but Uber as a loyalty layer: 46 million Uber One subscribers (Uber 10-K, Dec 2025) and 202 million monthly active platform consumers (Uber Q4 2025) being trained to value Uber Cash and Uber One status above Bonvoy points, Genius tiers, or ALL status, particularly at the lower-engagement, occasional-traveller end of the funnel.

For independent and boutique upper-upscale operators, this is a three- to five-year positioning question, not a 2026 channel decision. The right response is to fix loyalty, parity, and direct-booking economics now – using the post-DMA pricing freedom in Europe – so that when Uber’s distribution surface reaches scale, you have something to negotiate with rather than something to accept.

1. Two announcements, two different mechanics. On 29 April 2026 at its annual GO–GET event, Uber announced an in-app hotel booking tab powered by Expedia Group’s Rapid API, opening with more than 700,000 properties for US users, with Vrbo vacation rentals to follow later in 2026 and Uber rides going inside the Expedia app from June 2026 (Uber investor relations). On 30 April 2026, Accor and Uber announced a multi-market loyalty partnership across seven launch markets – France, Germany and Poland for rides and Uber Eats; UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Morocco for rides – with reciprocal status (Uber One annual members receive ALL Accor status upgrades; eligible ALL members get extended Uber One trials) (Accor press release, 30 April 2026). These are two distinct deals: the first is OTA-style supply aggregation; the second is a loyalty-to-loyalty linkage with no inventory transfer.
2. The historical record on travel super-apps is unfavourable in the West. TripAdvisor’s Instant Book, launched in June 2014, was largely abandoned in 2017 because conversion rates failed to justify the pivot from review site to booking site; Phocuswright’s Douglas Quinby characterised the issue as the “challenge of convincing customers that [TripAdvisor] is a booking site, not a review site” (Travel Weekly). TripAdvisor has now closed Instant Book to new sign-ups as of 11 November 2025 (Cloudbeds documentation). Paytm’s super-app project has been wound down, with travel and entertainment verticals divested or paused following the RBI’s 2024 action on Paytm Payments Bank (Inc42; Yahoo Finance). Grab’s travel vertical, originally launched in April 2019 with Agoda and Booking.com inventory, has been re-platformed as “GrabStays” through Nuitee in 2025 – a fourth iteration in six years. The pattern across Western and emerging-market attempts is consistent: aggregating supply does not equal owning the journey, because hotel discovery and decision-making typically happen weeks before any rideshare context.
3. Uber’s structural position is genuinely different from prior failed super-apps in three respects, but not the ways most coverage suggests. First, frequency: Uber reported 13.567 billion trips in 2025 and 202 million monthly active platform consumers in Q4 2025 (Uber FY2025 release). Second, payment infrastructure: Uber One reached 46 million members across 30 countries by 31 December 2025, up from 36 million in June 2025 (Uber 10-K and Q2 2025 release); members generate roughly three times the bookings of single-product users (Uber Q1 2025 earnings remarks, per PYMNTS). Third, behavioural data: Uber disclosed in late 2025 that airport trips alone account for 15% of global mobility gross bookings (Uber Engineering Blog), and the December 2025 launch of Uber Intelligence – a LiveRamp-powered data clean room – explicitly markets travel-intent and airport-trip segmentation to brands (MediaPost). What Uber does not yet have is the WeChat flywheel of a closed payment-and-social graph; that is structurally unavailable in the West because of Apple’s App Tracking Transparency framework, EU privacy regulation, and a fragmented payments landscape (J.P. Morgan, Payments Unbound).
4. Khosrowshahi has flipped his stance. In September 2021, he told Skift he was “fine not having a superapp model” and would not expand into selling flights or hotels. By April 2026 he was framing Uber as “an app for everything—helping people go, get and now travel all in one place” (Uber press release, 29 April 2026). At Uber’s Q4 2025 earnings call on 4 February 2026, he highlighted the platform reaching a 15 billion annualised trip run-rate, $193 billion in 2025 gross bookings, and a fifth consecutive year of 20%-plus annual gross bookings growth (Uber prepared remarks, Q4 2025).
5. The Expedia deal is, for hoteliers, an OTA distribution channel with extra steps. Skift’s own analysis (30 April 2026) concluded the partnership “tells you more about Expedia’s future than Uber’s”, noting that Expedia’s B2B segment grew 24% in Q4 2025 (Expedia FY2025 results), five times the pace of its consumer business. Skift reporter Sean O’Neill summarised it crisply: “For Uber, this is bait to drive more sign-ups to its paid subscription service. For Expedia, it’s an incremental channel. For hoteliers, another distribution tax of sorts.” The merchant of record sits with Expedia; commissions are split between Uber and Expedia (Skift, 29 April 2026). Hotels surfaced in the Uber app are paying Expedia’s standard commission (15–30% range, with independents paying the high end – Cloudbeds, Mize). For top-tier Uber One members redeeming the 10% Uber Cash plus 20% rotating discount, Skift’s modelling indicated Uber may be losing money on each booking, confirming the feature is a subscription retention tool rather than a profit engine.
6. The Accor deal is – for now – a co-marketing loyalty exercise, not a direct distribution channel. The press release from Accor (30 April 2026) is explicit that the partnership “introduces seamless account linking” and lets ALL members earn Accor points on Uber rides and Uber Eats, with reciprocal Uber One trials. Crucially, Accor is not surrendering inventory to be sold inside the Uber app at preferential rates. Hospitality Net’s framing was apt: “rather than building Uber points into the Accor wallet, Accor is letting members earn ALL points on Uber transactions, treating Uber as a recognised partner for daily-spend behaviour outside the hotel.” Alix Boulnois, Accor’s Chief Commercial, Digital & Tech Officer, framed it as extending loyalty “well beyond the traditional hotel stay”. Madhu Kannan, Uber’s Chief Business Officer, framed it as deepening Uber One’s everyday-spending value proposition. Both descriptions are accurate – and both indicate this is not yet the rate-parity-busting direct-distribution channel some commentary has implied.
7. The loyalty dilution risk is real and quantifiable. Marriott Bonvoy reached approximately 271 million members at year-end 2025, with members accounting for 68% of global room nights and 75% of US/Canada room nights (Marriott FY2025 results, via Luxury Travel Report). ALL Accor passed 100 million members in early 2025 (Accor press release). Industry-standard third-party valuations put Marriott Bonvoy points at 0.7–0.82 cents each (Frequent Miler; WalletHub; Yahoo Finance), Hilton Honors slightly lower, and ALL Accor at roughly 2 euro cents per point (The Points Guy, October 2024 valuations). The Expedia One Key programme already dilutes hotel loyalty by paying just 2% in OneKeyCash on most hotel bookings, and explicitly excluding hotel-brand status benefits when booking through Expedia channels (Upgraded Points; NerdWallet). Booking.com’s Genius programme – 10–20% discounts funded primarily by hotel partners – is, in PhocusWire’s framing, “a virtuous cycle” for the OTA but a margin transfer for hotels. Uber One adds a third layer to this dilution: a non-travel, daily-frequency loyalty currency that competes directly for the same wallet share without putting any heads in beds.
8. The post-DMA rate parity environment changes the analytical frame. Booking.com removed price parity clauses from EEA contracts on 1 July 2024 in compliance with its Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designation, and the Court of Justice of the European Union confirmed on 19 September 2024 that both wide and narrow parity clauses are not “ancillary restraints” under Article 101(1) TFEU (Covington Competition; KU Leuven CCM Blog). DMA Article 5(3) prohibits parity clauses for designated gatekeepers entirely. The Spanish CNMC fined Booking.com €413.24 million on 30 July 2024, partially reduced for parity-policy changes (Tech Policy Press). For European hotels, the contractual grip on direct rates is gone, although OTAs increasingly use ranking-algorithm “persuasion” to incentivise de facto parity (HotelBuddy; Hausfeld Competition Bulletin). This matters because if Uber begins to negotiate genuine preferential rates with hotel partners – the Accor deal does not yet do this, but a future iteration could – it could become a lever rather than another commission drag. As of May 2026, that is potential, not actual.
9. Independent hotels face a steeper challenge, with mitigating tools. HOTREC’s 2024 European Hotel Distribution Study (covering 3,089 hotels across 35 countries, reference year 2023) found OTAs hold 71% of European hotel OTA market share (Booking) plus 15% (Expedia), and that small hotels under 20 rooms see an average OTA share of 50%-plus in 27% of cases. Direct-channel share has declined back to 50.9% of overnights post-pandemic. Skift Research’s December 2024 forecast suggested hotel websites could overtake OTAs as the dominant digital channel by 2030, but in 2024 OTAs held a slight lead at $266 billion versus $262 billion in hotel gross bookings. Independent hotels typically pay the upper end of the 15–30% commission range, while branded chains pay 10–15% (Mize; Cloudbeds). On Uber’s hotel surface, branded chain inventory will benefit disproportionately from rate negotiation muscle and from cross-loyalty integrations like the Accor and Marriott tie-ups, while independents will appear at standard Expedia merchant-rate economics with no comparable loyalty hook.
10. The broader travel roadmap is in motion but partial. Uber’s UK travel page already sells trains and coaches (via Omio, including Eurostar), car hire (via Hertz, Avis and others), and flights, with 10% back in Uber Credits for Uber One members on most categories (uber.com/gb/en/u/travel-uk). The flights category is currently limited; there is no Trainline-equivalent integration globally; rental cars are pure click-out partnerships. Uber for Business is positioned as a corporate ground-transport vehicle, not yet a corporate hotel-booking competitor to American Express GBT or BCD Travel. The hotel feature is the single biggest expansion in the verticals stack since Uber Eats – but at $193 billion of gross bookings in 2025 (overwhelmingly mobility and delivery) versus Booking Holdings’ $165 billion in lodging-led gross bookings in 2024, Uber would need years of double-digit hotel GMV growth to become a meaningful share of either Uber’s revenue or hotel distribution.

Three structural failures recur across previous travel super-app attempts. First, booking frequency mismatch: TripAdvisor reaches users at the research stage, weeks before booking; Grab and Gojek reach users at the rideshare and food-delivery stage, days before or during travel; Paytm reached users at point-of-payment. None of these moments are when hotel decisions are made. As Phocuswright’s Robert Cole observed in PhocusWire (29 April 2026), “hotels are booked weeks if not months in advance of travel” – the same critique applies to Uber’s hotel tab.

Second, lack of payment-layer control: WeChat’s super-app status rests on WeChat Pay being the closed-loop payment system for both consumer-to-merchant and consumer-to-consumer flows in China; no Western platform has equivalent payment ubiquity, and EU/US privacy and antitrust regimes preclude consolidating one (J.P. Morgan; Modern Retail).

Third, supply aggregation without owned demand intent: Grab’s travel vertical reverted from a B2C OTA-style integration (with Booking Holdings as a shareholder via a $200 million investment in 2018) to a partner-app model with Nuitee in 2025, because Grab users were not opening Grab to plan trips – they were opening it for rides and food.

The thesis to test against Uber is whether frequency without intent is more or less valuable than intent without frequency (the OTA model). The honest answer in May 2026 is that no Western precedent has resolved this; Skift’s own coverage on 30 April 2026 framed the Uber–Expedia tie-up as “Uber bought a hotel tab the year it stopped mattering”, arguing that travel discovery is migrating into AI assistants (ChatGPT apps, Perplexity) rather than super-apps – and that Booking.com and Expedia are simultaneously embedding directly into those AI surfaces.

Uber’s headline data claim is meaningful. Airport trips representing 15% of global mobility gross bookings (Uber Engineering Blog) gives Uber a granular view of inbound and outbound travel timing that no OTA holds. Uber Intelligence, launched in December 2025 with LiveRamp, packages this as a “data clean room” allowing brands to combine first-party data with Uber’s pseudonymised signals; the example use cases Uber publicises explicitly include hotel brands identifying which restaurants or entertainment venues to partner with for loyalty (Business Insider, via MediaPost). Uber’s advertising business was on a $2 billion annualised run-rate by Q4 2025 (Uber Q4 2025 prepared remarks).

Compared structurally to Booking.com or Expedia, Uber’s data captures the journey rather than the transaction: when a guest moves between hotel and airport, when they leave the property at night, what restaurants they go to. OTAs hold purchase intent and price sensitivity; Uber holds in-destination behaviour. For revenue managers, the more pertinent question is whether Uber will sell that intelligence to OTAs and brands on terms that are favourable, neutral, or hostile to individual hotels. As of May 2026, Uber Intelligence is sold as a marketing product to advertisers, not as a revenue management feed to operators – and there is no public commitment to make airport-trip flow data available to hotels at the property level.

The integration uses Expedia’s Rapid API (the same B2B technology that powers Revolut Stays, where Expedia is also the underlying provider per Revolut’s terms and conditions, and which has powered numerous fintech and consumer-app travel features since 2021). Expedia is the merchant of record on the booking. Commission is paid to Expedia at the negotiated property rate; Uber receives a share from Expedia. For hotels already contracted with Expedia Group, no new contract is needed – inventory flows automatically unless a hotel actively suppresses Uber as a distribution point (and even this may be limited under standard Expedia agreements; revenue managers should check their specific contract clauses on B2B redistribution).

Uber One member benefits – 10% back in Uber Cash and 20% off rotating selections of more than 10,000 hotels – are funded primarily by Uber, with Expedia coordinating eligible inventory. The Points Guy’s testing on launch day (29 April 2026) found Hyatt Regency San Francisco at $349 per night via Uber versus $389 standard or $354 member rate direct, with the Uber One credit advantage of $53–$91 over a two-night stay. Crucially, no Hyatt stay credit or World of Hyatt points were earned – confirming the loyalty dilution mechanic in practice.

For commercial directors, the key practical question is whether the Uber surface is additive demand (capturing bookings that would not have happened) or cannibalising (shifting bookings from your own direct channel or other OTAs into a slightly more expensive distribution path). The answer will vary by property type: city-centre upper-upscale properties with high airport-arrival mix are most exposed; resort and destination properties with planning lead-times measured in months are least exposed.

What Accor has done is structurally different from what Marriott, Hilton, and IHG did with Uber a decade ago. Marriott’s Uber partnership, in place since 2021 and re-tiered in October 2024, lets Bonvoy members earn 1–3 points per dollar on Uber rides and qualifying Uber Eats orders, and now lets Uber One annual subscribers receive complimentary Bonvoy Silver Elite status (uber.com/us/en/u/marriott-bonvoy/). Hilton’s older HHonors-Uber tie-up, dating to 2015–2016, integrated Uber booking inside the Hilton app and used Uber location data for “Local Scene” recommendations. These are tactical loyalty plumbing.

The Accor deal is broader in two ways: it is multi-market from launch (seven countries, including Accor strongholds in France and the Gulf), and it includes reciprocal status – Uber One annual members get an ALL Accor status uplift, which is an unusual concession by a hotel group to a non-travel platform. The strategic question is whether this represents the start of Uber as a sourcing channel for direct hotel inventory (it does not, yet), or whether it is fundamentally a customer-acquisition cross-promotion (it is, currently). Madhu Kannan’s quote about “building one of the most valuable everyday membership programmes” is the giveaway: this is Uber One subscriber acquisition dressed as hotel loyalty.

There is no announced equivalent deal with Hilton, IHG, Hyatt, NH, or Radisson as of May 2026. Whether other groups follow depends on Accor’s reported uptake metrics – which, given the H2 2026 launch timing, will not be available until late 2026 at earliest.

The mechanics matter. Marriott reports Bonvoy members account for 68% of global room nights at properties (Marriott FY2025); the program adds members at roughly 40 million per year and increasingly attaches them via the credit-card route rather than stay-based engagement (One Mile at a Time). Marriott CFO Leeny Oberg attributed Bonvoy penetration growth from 58% to 68% partly to partnerships including Uber and Starbucks (Customer Experience Dive, 2025). On the OTA side, Booking.com’s Genius programme reportedly increases bookings 15–20% for participating properties (Ad Hoc News citing Booking.com data), but the discount and visibility costs are funded primarily by hoteliers.

Uber One is a different category of dilution. A Bonvoy point sits inside a hotel-redemption ecosystem – it ultimately routes the guest back to a Marriott property. Uber Cash routes the guest to a ride or a meal. From the hotel’s perspective, every Uber One credit accumulated is wallet share lost permanently from hotel loyalty redemption. The October 2024 Marriott devaluation of Uber-earned points (from 6× on Uber Eats to 1–2×, per AwardWallet’s tracking) is itself evidence that hotel groups now view Uber-channel loyalty as expensive and are pulling back on the rates they fund. The trajectory across hotel groups is for Uber-spending earn rates to soften, not increase.

For independents with no loyalty programme to dilute, the calculus is simpler – there is no programme to defend – but the economic consequence is that branded competitors will increasingly bundle Uber benefits as a soft incentive that an unbranded property cannot match.

Two factors will determine whether Uber’s hotel tab evolves from “another OTA channel” into “a parity-buster”:

1. Whether Uber negotiates direct preferential rates with chains. As of May 2026, the Accor deal is loyalty-only, and Expedia inventory in the Uber app is at standard Expedia merchant rates (with Uber-funded discounts layered on top). If, in 2027–2028, Uber begins negotiating direct B2B contracts with chains and independents – cutting Expedia out – this becomes a different conversation.
2. Whether the post-DMA pricing freedom in Europe extends globally. UK and US hotels are not yet covered by the September 2024 ECJ ruling; Booking.com has not committed to dropping parity outside the EEA (HotelBuddy, May 2025). If hotels can offer Uber One members a genuinely better rate than is publicly listed on Booking.com, the channel becomes attractive. If parity persists in core markets, it does not.

Henry Harteveldt of Atmosphere Research has historically argued that hotels view metasearch and integrated booking surfaces as “a compelling distribution choice” if they get guest data and competitive economics (Travel Weekly archive). The HOTREC 2024 study makes clear that European hoteliers’ principal complaint with current OTAs is data withholding and undercutting via OTA-funded discounts without consent – exactly the practices Uber now risks importing through the 20% rotating Uber One discount on the 10,000-hotel rotating selection.

The realistic playbook for an 80-room independent boutique or upper-upscale property is threefold:

First, treat Uber as Expedia. If the property is already on Expedia’s Rapid network, Uber inventory is automatic; the commercial decision is whether the additional booking volume from the Uber surface justifies the same Expedia commission. Most independents will conclude yes for now, given the low marginal cost.

Second, exploit the post-DMA parity gap aggressively in Europe. The ECJ’s September 2024 ruling and Booking.com’s July 2024 contract changes mean European independents can legitimately offer lower direct rates. Less than half are doing so, partly out of habit and partly because Booking.com’s algorithm still rewards effective parity (HotelBuddy). Independents that offer a 5–10% direct-rate discount, plus a tangible perk (room category, late checkout, F&B credit), can functionally compete with Uber One discounts without surrendering margin to a third intermediary.

Third, plug into independent loyalty and curation infrastructure. Small Luxury Hotels of the World, Design Hotels (Marriott-owned but operated as a soft brand), Relais & Châteaux, and the Independent Hotel Show ecosystem provide loyalty cross-pollination without the structural dilution of a chain programme. None of these have so far announced Uber partnerships, and the strategic question for these consortia in 2026–2027 is whether to negotiate group-level loyalty linkage – which would give independents a shared lever – or remain platform-neutral.

The signals worth tracking:

• Does Uber surface flights, trains, or rental cars at scale outside the UK pilot (active since August 2022 with Omio)? Currently limited; meaningful expansion would indicate genuine super-app commitment.
• Does Uber for Business launch a corporate hotel programme? This would put Uber into direct competition with American Express GBT, BCD Travel, and CWT for the managed-travel segment – a very different commercial threat profile to leisure.
• Does Uber Intelligence expand to property-level data sales? If hotels can buy in-destination guest behaviour data via Uber, the relationship becomes more two-sided.
• Do Hilton, Marriott, IHG, or Hyatt announce inventory-level (not just loyalty) integrations with Uber? Loyalty deals are incremental; inventory deals would mark a structural shift.
• Does the Uber–Expedia booking volume disclose at any point? Neither company has committed to publishing it; analyst inference will be the only signal until then.

Over a three- to five-year horizon, Uber is most likely to be:

• A meaningful but secondary distribution channel for branded chains and city-centre upper-upscale independents, particularly in major airport markets, with single-digit booking share gains by 2028–2029.
• A real loyalty disruptor for the lower-engagement traveller segment, where Uber Cash earned on daily mobility competes plausibly with Bonvoy or Hilton Honors points earned only on stays.
• A genuine data threat if Uber Intelligence expands and Uber’s airport-flow data becomes a saleable asset to OTAs, branded chains, and metasearch.
• Largely a noise event for resort properties, destination boutique hotels, and independent rural/regional properties whose guests do not use Uber and whose decision moments are not platform-mediated.

The central error to avoid is treating the Expedia tie-up and the Accor tie-up as the same story. They are not. The Expedia deal is the OTA-as-channel question, with familiar mechanics and known risks. The Accor deal is the loyalty-as-currency question, with a longer-term and more structurally significant trajectory if other chains follow.

For the next 90 days:

1. Audit your existing Expedia Group contract to confirm whether your inventory is already flowing into the Uber surface, and at what rate. If it is, monitor production reporting separately if Expedia provides channel-level data; if it does not, request it.
2. Quantify your current loyalty-dilution exposure. For chain-affiliated properties, model what happens to your contribution from loyalty room nights if even 5% of bookings shift to OneKeyCash, Genius rewards, or Uber Cash redemptions instead of brand-loyalty redemptions. Use this as the baseline against which Uber’s growth should be measured.
3. In European properties, formally test direct-rate discounting up to 10% below your public Booking.com rate, with monitoring of OTA ranking impact. The legal ground to do this exists post-September 2024; the operational commitment to do it usually does not.

For the next 12 months: 4. Negotiate explicitly with your OTA partners on the question of redistribution to third-party surfaces such as Uber, Revolut Stays, and AI-assistant integrations. Insist on transparency over which surfaces your inventory is appearing on, and at what net rate to your property. 5. For independents, evaluate joining a curated consortium (Small Luxury Hotels of the World, Design Hotels, Relais & Châteaux, Mr & Mrs Smith) if not already a member. Group-level loyalty cross-pollination is the most realistic counter to chain-Uber bundles. 6. For boutique and upper-upscale properties with high airport-arrival mix, develop a property-level Uber relationship for ground-transport guest experience (Uber for Business voucher integration, branded Uber rides from arrival terminals). The relationship will be strategically useful when Uber’s hotel surface matures.

Trigger events that should change this approach:

• Uber announces a direct hotel sourcing programme (bypassing Expedia) – elevate from “monitor” to “active commercial response”.
• A second top-five hotel group (Hilton, Marriott, IHG, Hyatt) signs an Accor-equivalent multi-market loyalty deal with Uber – treat as the signal that loyalty cross-pollination is becoming an industry norm and accelerate counter-strategy.
• The European Commission or a national competition authority extends DMA-style parity prohibitions to non-OTA platforms – review channel mix and direct-rate strategy comprehensively.
• Uber discloses booking volumes from the hotel tab exceeding 1% of total Uber gross bookings (currently zero disclosed) – treat as confirmation the channel has reached scale.

Caveats

This analysis is written shortly after the 29–30 April 2026 announcements. Several quantitative claims that would sharpen the picture are not yet public: the booking volume Uber’s hotel tab has produced in its first weeks, the commission split between Uber and Expedia under the Rapid API arrangement, the projected 2026–2027 hotel GMV target inside Uber’s investor framework, and the actual uptake of the Accor reciprocal status feature. These will emerge through Uber’s quarterly earnings, Expedia’s investor disclosures, and Accor’s H2 2026 trading commentary.

Skift’s modelling that Uber loses money on top-tier Uber One hotel bookings is its own estimate, not Uber-disclosed economics. Phocuswright’s Robert Cole and Mike Schmid’s quoted commentary in PhocusWire is interpretive analyst opinion rather than primary research. The HOTREC distribution study is hotelier-funded research with a specific advocacy frame around the DMA, although its methodology (3,089 hotels, 35 countries, biennial since 2014) is robust and academically credible (HES-SO Valais Wallis is the academic partner). Marriott Bonvoy point valuations from Frequent Miler and WalletHub are third-party estimates based on observed redemption patterns, not Marriott-disclosed accounting.

The thesis that Western super-apps have structurally failed in travel reflects the consensus across J.P. Morgan, Modern Retail, and academic work cited (van der Vlist et al. on super-appification), but it is a thesis about the past five years, not a prediction about the next five. AI assistants such as ChatGPT and Perplexity, with embedded Booking.com, Expedia and Tripadvisor apps as of late 2025, may render the entire super-app architectural debate moot by routing travel discovery through conversational interfaces – a scenario in which Uber’s hotel tab and Booking.com’s app are both ultimately downstream of OpenAI’s distribution layer. Operators planning beyond a 24-month horizon should weight the AI-assistant scenario at least as heavily as the super-app scenario.

Finally, the regulatory environment around platform parity, gatekeeper designation, and cross-platform loyalty data sharing is unsettled in both the EU and the US. The September 2024 ECJ ruling, the July 2024 Spanish CNMC fine, and the November 2024 deadline for Booking.com DMA compliance establish the European trajectory, but US enforcement remains case-by-case and the UK position is captured by the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s review of the BGL case. Hotel commercial leaders should track these specifically rather than assuming a uniform global parity environment.

Main sources: